Section 27(3) Finance Act 1967: A Look at Losses
Section 27(3) of the Finance Act 1967 in the United Kingdom addresses a specific scenario concerning the carry-forward of trading losses incurred by companies within a group structure, particularly in the context of changes in ownership and the nature of the trade being conducted.
The core issue tackled by this section is preventing the exploitation of trading losses. Imagine a company with significant accumulated losses. An individual or another company might seek to acquire it, not for its ongoing business activities, but specifically to utilize those carried-forward losses to offset future profits from a completely different and newly introduced trade. Section 27(3) acts as a safeguard against this type of tax avoidance.
In essence, the section stipulates that if there is both a change in the ownership of a company and a major change in the nature or conduct of its trade within a specified period, then the carried-forward trading losses accumulated before the change cannot be used to offset profits arising after the change. This prevents the “buying” of losses to artificially reduce tax liabilities.
Several key elements are crucial to understanding the application of Section 27(3):
- Change in Ownership: This usually refers to a significant change in the beneficial ownership of the company’s share capital. The precise threshold for what constitutes a “change” is determined by other relevant tax legislation and case law, but it typically involves a shift in control.
- Major Change in the Nature or Conduct of the Trade: This is a more subjective test. It requires an assessment of whether the core business activities have fundamentally altered. Factors considered include changes in the type of goods or services provided, the company’s customer base, its operational structure, and the scale of the business. A mere expansion or modernization of the existing trade is generally not considered a “major change.” However, a complete shift to a new industry or a radical alteration of the business model likely would be.
- Specified Period: The legislation defines a timeframe during which the change in ownership and the change in trade must occur. This period allows for examination whether the two changes are related.
The objective of Section 27(3) is to ensure that trading losses are used to offset profits generated by the same, or substantially the same, trade that incurred those losses. If a company radically changes its business after a change in ownership, it is considered a new entity for tax purposes, and it should not benefit from the legacy of previous trading losses incurred under different circumstances.
While Section 27(3) aims to prevent abuse, it can also present genuine challenges for companies undergoing legitimate restructuring or diversification. Navigating its complexities often requires expert advice to ensure compliance and to optimize tax planning within the legal framework.