Carlyle Finance and Payment Protection Insurance (PPI)
Carlyle Finance, like many financial institutions in the UK, offered Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) alongside its loan and credit products. PPI was designed to cover loan repayments in the event a borrower became unable to work due to illness, accident, or unemployment. However, a widespread mis-selling scandal engulfed the PPI industry, including products sold by Carlyle Finance.
The core issue revolved around the improper sale of PPI policies. Many customers were unaware they were even purchasing PPI, or were pressured into taking it out despite it being unsuitable for their circumstances. Common examples of mis-selling included:
- Lack of Information: Customers weren’t fully informed about the terms and conditions of the policy, including exclusions and limitations. They may not have understood what events were covered or what would disqualify them from making a claim.
- Unsuitability: PPI was sold to individuals who were unlikely to benefit, such as the self-employed (who might have difficulty claiming unemployment cover), or those with pre-existing medical conditions.
- Coercion: Customers felt pressured into buying PPI as a condition of receiving a loan or credit agreement. This effectively removed their choice and violated financial regulations.
- Failure to Assess Affordability: Carlyle Finance may not have adequately assessed whether customers could afford the additional cost of PPI, potentially leading them into financial difficulty.
- Commission Bias: Sales staff were often incentivized to sell PPI, leading to a potential bias towards recommending it regardless of the customer’s needs.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) set a deadline of August 29, 2019, for consumers to make PPI claims. While this deadline has passed, certain exceptions may still apply. Individuals who believe they were mis-sold PPI by Carlyle Finance may still be able to pursue a claim if they have grounds to believe their claim was handled unfairly or if exceptional circumstances prevented them from claiming before the deadline.
Historically, making a PPI claim involved contacting Carlyle Finance directly, or using the services of a claims management company. The process involved providing details of the original loan or credit agreement, the PPI policy, and the reasons why the customer believed they were mis-sold. Carlyle Finance was then required to investigate the claim and provide a response, either upholding the claim and offering compensation, or rejecting it with an explanation.
The PPI scandal had a significant financial impact on the financial services industry, with billions of pounds paid out in compensation. While Carlyle Finance may not have been the largest player in the market, it was nonetheless implicated in the widespread mis-selling practices that characterized the PPI era. If you believe you were mis-sold PPI by Carlyle Finance, it’s worth researching your options and seeking professional advice, even though the general deadline has passed, to explore whether any exceptions apply to your situation.