Islamic finance, while rooted in principles aimed at ethical and socially responsible investing, is not without its controversies. These stem from various aspects, including interpretation of Islamic law (Sharia), the practicality of applying its principles in the modern financial landscape, and concerns about the potential for “Sharia-washing.” One central point of contention lies in the interpretation of *riba* (interest). Classical Islamic jurisprudence strictly prohibits interest-based lending and borrowing. However, modern Islamic finance seeks to comply with this prohibition through alternative mechanisms like *Murabaha* (cost-plus financing), *Ijara* (leasing), and *Musharaka* (profit-and-loss sharing). Critics argue that some of these instruments, particularly *Murabaha*, are functionally equivalent to conventional loans with a pre-determined interest rate disguised as a profit margin. The debate centers on whether the form of the transaction truly reflects its economic substance and whether it genuinely adheres to the spirit of *riba* prohibition. Another area of controversy involves the role of Sharia boards. These boards are composed of Islamic scholars who oversee Islamic financial institutions to ensure compliance with Sharia principles. However, concerns have been raised about the independence and expertise of some board members. Critics argue that some scholars may be influenced by the financial institutions themselves, leading to rulings that favor profit maximization over strict adherence to Islamic principles. The lack of a universally accepted set of Sharia standards also contributes to inconsistencies in rulings across different institutions and jurisdictions, creating confusion and potentially undermining the credibility of Islamic finance. Furthermore, the application of Islamic finance principles to complex financial products and markets presents challenges. The development of Sharia-compliant derivatives, for example, has been met with skepticism. Critics question whether these instruments, which are inherently speculative, can truly be reconciled with the Islamic emphasis on risk-sharing and asset-backed transactions. The opaqueness of some Islamic financial products and the difficulty in assessing their true risk profile have also raised concerns about potential systemic risks. “Sharia-washing” is another major concern. This refers to the practice of superficially adhering to Islamic principles for marketing purposes without genuinely reflecting the underlying values. It involves repackaging conventional financial products as Sharia-compliant, often through minor modifications that have little impact on their economic function or ethical implications. Such practices undermine the integrity of Islamic finance and erode public trust. Finally, the focus on religious compliance can sometimes overshadow other important considerations, such as environmental sustainability and social impact. While Islamic finance aims to promote ethical behavior, a more comprehensive approach is needed to ensure that investments contribute to broader societal goals beyond mere adherence to Sharia rules. This requires a greater emphasis on integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into investment decisions.