Joseph de Finance (1904-2000) was a prominent Belgian Jesuit philosopher and a leading figure in 20th-century transcendental Thomism. His work focused on metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of being, deeply engaging with both classical Thomistic thought and contemporary philosophical currents, particularly phenomenology and existentialism. He sought to revitalize Thomism by demonstrating its relevance to modern philosophical concerns.
De Finance’s philosophical project centered on understanding the relationship between being and existence. He argued that being, understood as the act of existing (esse), is not a static essence but a dynamic and inherently relational principle. This act of existing, according to de Finance, is not something added to an already complete essence but is rather the very foundation of its reality. He emphasized the dynamism and openness of being, resisting any attempt to reduce it to a fixed category or concept. This dynamic view of being is crucial for understanding his engagement with contemporary philosophy.
A key aspect of de Finance’s work is his appropriation and modification of the transcendental method, pioneered by thinkers like Karl Rahner. He employed this method to explore the conditions of possibility for knowledge and experience. He argued that the human intellect possesses a pre-conceptual openness to being, a transcendental horizon that makes knowledge possible. This “transcendental desire for being” allows the mind to grasp the intelligibility of the world. He saw this desire as an intrinsic feature of the human spirit, driving the quest for truth and understanding.
His engagement with phenomenology, particularly the work of Husserl, influenced his understanding of consciousness and intentionality. De Finance recognized the importance of lived experience in accessing reality, emphasizing the role of intentionality in shaping our understanding of the world. However, he distinguished his approach from purely subjective interpretations, insisting on the objective ground of being that underlies all experience. He argued that the phenomenological method, when properly understood, can lead to a deeper appreciation of the metaphysical foundations of reality.
De Finance also addressed the problem of God’s existence, arguing that the very dynamism and openness of being points to a necessary ground and source of all existence. He maintained that a finite being, marked by contingency and limitation, necessarily implies the existence of an infinite and uncaused being, which he identified with God. His approach to theodicy, or the problem of evil, attempted to reconcile the existence of evil with the goodness and omnipotence of God by emphasizing the freedom of created beings and the inherent limitations of a finite world. De Finance’s work is characterized by a rigorous and nuanced engagement with philosophical tradition, combined with a genuine openness to the challenges and insights of contemporary thought. His contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, and philosophical theology have had a lasting impact on the development of Thomistic thought in the 20th century and continue to be relevant to contemporary philosophical debates.